Couples get no love from IRS

by Lisa Keen
Tuesday Mar 24, 2009

Every year, taxpayers who send in their tax returns sign a statement at the bottom of their forms stating, "Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete."

And yet, the Internal Revenue Service expects gay people who are legally married to same-sex spouses to lie on their tax returns and check off "single" as their filing status.

"Under federal tax law, gay marriages are not recognized because of the Defense of Marriage Act," said Nancy Mathis, an IRS spokeswoman. "Therefore, same-sex marriages are not recognized, so [gay spouses] have to file as single taxpayers."

That's what the IRS expects, and yet its Web site and instruction booklets offer only one sentence of guidance to married same-sex couples who must prepare tax returns for the federal government. That sentence simply states the impact of DOMA: "For federal tax purposes, a marriage means only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife."

Massachusetts and California, on their Web sites, have extensive, easy-to-find guides for same-sex married couples on how to file their state taxes. Instructions for Connecticut, which began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in November 2008, are more muddled, in part because the state also has civil unions.

The number of same-sex couples having to tackle the insults and inequities of the federal tax return is growing. They numbered about 10,000 - all in Massachusetts - last year. This year, Massachusetts has topped 16,000 (according to Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders) and California (between June and November) added more than 18,000. (Figures for Connecticut are not yet available, due to technical issues.)

What these couples will discover - if they didn't already know - is that DOMA not only renders them second-class citizens - by virtue of requiring that their legitimate marriages be deemed invisible - but it forces them to pay more taxes than similarly situated heterosexual couples.

Nima Eshghi, an attorney with GLAD, the New England organization that this month filed a federal lawsuit challenging DOMA, can rattle off five costly disparities without even glancing at notes:

1. Shuffling down the tax rate. In many relationships, one spouse earns more than the other. Sometimes, the higher income could - for an individual - mean a much higher tax rate. But a married heterosexual married couple - by filing jointly - can, in essence, shuffle off the higher tax rate on the larger income, said Eshghi, "because the married filing jointly category allows for income splitting so the higher income doesn't get bumped up to the higher tax rate." Because same-sex married couples can't file as married filing jointly, she noted, "they lose the benefit of being able to pay less taxes and, in fact, pay more than similarly situated opposite sex couples would pay."

2. Spousal IRA deduction. For married couples filing jointly, the tax code allows one spouse to contribute up to $5,000 to an individual retirement account for the other spouse. There are limits, but it provides straight couples with yet another valuable deduction that gay married couples can't have.

3. Tax-free gifting. Anytime you gift something - cash or otherwise - worth more than $12,000 to someone, you have to pay the IRS a tax on that. Unless you're married to that person and - because of DOMA - that person is of the opposite sex. In other words, one spouse can put the other spouse on the title of a house and there's no tax to be paid. But if a gay person tries to do the same for his or her same-sex spouse, then he or she must pay the "gift tax" on the value of half the house minus $12,000. (In tax year 2009, the exclusion goes up to $13,000.)

4. Tax-free health coverage. Employers often pay all or part of an employee's health insurance coverage, including family plans that cover a spouse and children. For tax purposes, the cost of this coverage is not considered to be part of the employee's income. But, if the federal government - as under DOMA - does not consider your spouse to be a spouse under federal law, then it looks at the health coverage for your same-sex spouse as if it is additional income provided by your employer. You pay taxes on that, where your straight colleague does not. One plaintiff couple in GLAD's lawsuit challenging DOMA estimates they pay about $1,200 per year more because of this disparity.

5. Tax-free estate transfer. When one spouse dies in a straight married couple, the surviving spouse often receives the full value of their estate and assets. And the surviving spouse pays no tax on that gain, which is often in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, or millions, if a house is involved. But if a spouse in a same-sex marriage dies and leaves all his or her estate and assets to his or her spouse, that surviving spouse has to pay taxes on the value above $1 million.

Next: Legal challenges


  • , 2009-03-24 09:38:22

    Well now we know the gay marriage nuts have gone completely round the bend. Now they’re whining that they don’t have to suffer the same IRS marriage penalty that straight couples do. What is next, whining because when you break up with yor boy/girlfriend the courts don’t take half your assets and give them to your former partner? God you people are ridiculous.

  • , 2009-03-24 18:06:06

    Let’s vote on your rights and see how ridiculous you feel.

  • , 2009-03-26 11:56:52

    Your rights are no more abriged than mine. Both of us are free to marry the girl of our choise (yuck) and produce bambini inside the bounds of holy matrimony. Or not. What rights have you lost, bub? You just don’t like the rights you have and want new ones.

Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook